Rice University logo
 
Top blue bar image
The student blog for Rice University's Urban Lab in Shanghai.
 

Posts Tagged ‘Air Polluttion’


Day 3: The Urbanizing Shanghai

March 9th, 2014 by glb1

Day 3 began on a different note for me as I went out to the track in the morning and got my first “Shanghai workout.” While everything went according to plan, what I enjoyed seeing was the host of people either walking or running around the track, doing Tai chi, or another activity. The majority of these people were older people as well. In addition to this observation, the point that my workout went without any “hiccups” I found slightly surprising. I say this because I came with the preconceived idea that the air quality would be so bad, that I may have trouble breathing or could run the risk of attaining some type of breathing problem. I laugh now that I think about that because I found literally no difference in the air quality that I experienced versus that in the states. Whether or not I just caught Shanghai on a good day is still up for question, but all in all, this was a prejudice of mine that was successfully refuted.

We then made our way to the awe inspiring Shanghai World Financial Center. The number of high rises, all creatively unique and beautiful in their own right in this Pudong New area made Houston’s downtown high-rise district look not-all-so impressive. We even ran into the very same art piece that we have on campus at Rice down in-front of the mall located in this area (I will attach the picture). As you may see in all the pictures, this entire area was very beautiful and filled with many futuristic looking buildings.

The first session of the day was located at a place called the Sino Finnish Center, which is home to a NGO called JUCCE, or Joint US-China Clean Energy. This is by far my favorite session thus far because it pertained to my very own topic with much detail.  The founder and director of the organization first spoke to us and gave a us a brief outline of what they focus on which included: nutrition education for kids, keeping China from having the “bling dream” but embracing what she called the “China dream,” and also training Chinese governmental officials how to build a sustainable city. The last point of focus is what I thought the most interesting approach mainly because being able to orchestrate something like this could possibly only occurring within a centralized government system like China has. We then had a professor of urban planning design share with us his work and personal philosophies on development. Through everything he shared, what intrigued me the most was his general perspective of always looking ahead to what the future holds for the development and prosperity of Shanghai. While they are in the midst of taking care of some very serious environmental issues, he mentioned how this is a period that the city has to get through in order to continue to progress.

After the session, we had group discussion session with Professor Fang, Professor Jing, and everyone else in the lab at a coffee shop at an urbanization innovation space called KIC or knowledge and innovation center. This was a cool space because it very much embraced the sustainable innovation of urban areas that was talked about in the early session. You can check out the very livable space in the pictures I post for this post.

Day 4 – An Insight Into Shanghai Media

March 6th, 2014 by mjr8

Day 4 gave us all a little insight into how the media works in Shanghai. Firstly, we had visited one of the most popular newspapers in Shanghai called the Global Times.

Global Times is a newspaper that highlights what is happening around the world, in addition to what is happening locally in Shanghai and China. Again, I would agree that a lot of our skepticism was dispelled after meeting with the head of the newspaper. The most contentious issue that I would say many people care about in China is whether or not media operates as an autonomous entity. We were told that though Global Times is owned by the state, the content is what the writers want it to be. She stressed to us that nobody is forced to write anything by the central government. From the outside, it is understandable to think such a thing. After all, each country has its own slant or bias when reporting on other countries. I think it is highly important that people should become impartial and not let government actions craft our opinions on the people of other nations, as we probably did before we found out that many of the preconceived stereotypes we had were untrue.

Besides the political side of the meeting there were some universal issues that were addressed, such as whether newspapers are a dying form of media or not. Based off of her opinion and ours, collectively, we agreed that newspapers are in fact a dying form of media. Despite the 1 million people who are subscribers of these newspapers, Global Times has shifted their focus to the internet. In a world where technology is easily accessible to people, it makes sense that businesses and media groups would look to be available to as many customers as they can. They even have versions of their news in English, reinforcing the concept that news outlets want to reach a wider array of audiences. Shortly after the meeting, though, we got a brief tour of the offices where people work on the newspaper and online website. Most people never get this chance so I definitely felt privileged to not only gather so much information about the newspaper from the director of it, but by also being able to have first person access to the “production” of the paper.

Next on the itinerary was to visit the Shanghai Media group or SMG. SMG is a multimedia broadcasting company that has a large influence on the media in Shanghai. When we got to the SMG’s building of operations we had first gotten a tour of the editing room, broadcasting set, and public relations office. Let me tell you, setting foot on the set where news anchors broadcast to millions of people each day is overwhelming.

After the quick tour of the building we met the directors of the SMG in a conference room. They were there to answer all of our questions on the role and responsibilities of news outlets in China and Shanghai. Though it was a bit of a reiteration of the meeting with Global Times, it was satisfying to get to see how other people’s mentalities are developed. At SMG, I got the sense that they were industrious when something relates to their job, in addition to being very fervent about it. They were quick to quell any disbelief we had about the role of media in Shanghai and as a matter of fact, in China. Again, they made sure that we understood that the central state, despite technically “owning” their company, had no role in what was broadcasted over the TV. Also, what seemed to be a serious concern for most of us on this trip, when interviewing people, is the pollution problem here in Shanghai. Unequivocally, most people in the West think in a parallel way to this. It is the collective belief that the government does not allow pollution and environmental concerns to be reported. According to these people, as well as most of the people we talked to, the Chinese government views pollution as an impediment to their goals of growth and as a detriment to people’s health. As a result, they encourage and allow people to highlight these issues by any means of media.

It always is important to take things with a grain of salt. This is exactly what I have done for the most part of this day. Although these people have influence and authority in what they do, it is always wise to question what comes out of their mouths. On the contrary, it is also important to be open minded and impartial to ideas in the world. If we were all close-minded to new ideas and thoughts, then the world would be a much different place, and not in a good way. So while I do still have some reservations and doubts about the handling on environmental issues here in Shanghai and China, at the same time I truly believe something is being done to alleviate the problems associated with it. No country wants to deal with this problem because not only does it affect the population’s health in the short term and long term, but it impacts the economy, something the Chinese government cannot afford.

Environmental Issues in Shanghai

March 5th, 2014 by efd1

So far we’ve been pretty lucky with the air quality during the time we’ve been in Shanghai. But, as news reports earlier this year indicate, the environment, especially air quality, is still a very relevant concern in Shanghai. One of the most interesting lectures we’ve had so far was a lecture by an environmental engineering professor at Jiao Tong University. The professor broke Shanghai’s environmental issues into four major components: air quality, water quality, solid waste, and noise. Her statistics indicated that for the most part Shanghai’s environmental issues are improving. To some extent these improvements are due to new environmental regulations and technology. But the professor indicated that the majority of these improvements is due to heavy industrial activities moving out of the city, especially to western regions of China.

Are these improvements then simply a matter of redistributing pollution to other areas of the country? To some extent spreading pollution out does serve to decrease its impact on the environment. One of the major concepts she talked about in her presentation was the idea of “environmental capacity”, which is the amount of pollution the environment can dissipate. Shanghai’s waterways in particular are over capacity, so moving pollution away from the city can significantly improve water quality on an aggregate level. Another major advantage of redistribution is that the actual effect of pollution on humans is decreased by moving polluting industries away from densely populated areas.

At the same time it seems like redistributing pollution isn’t a real solution to the problem of pollution. Recently, the rise of microblogging in China has made it difficult for companies to relocate some industries. The professor gave the example of Project PX, which was a chemical plant that was forced to relocate several times due to citizen complaints. In the long term only technological development will decrease pollution levels without restricting economic activity. Moreover, air and water pollution is not truly local. Eventually China will need a true solution to these environmental problems.

March 5, 2014 | Day 5 in Shanghai

March 5th, 2014 by hb10

We spent our fifth day in Shanghai at an urbanization museum and in lectures about the environment and higher education. I have been interested in education reform in the U.S. for a number of years so I was interested in what education policy looks like here in China. I leaned that going to university here is quite inexpensive– a semester’s tuition is about three-hundred dollars.  That being said, in order to get to the top schools, students in China have to spend a lot of money on personal tutors in order to prepare for the standardized admissions exams. I asked our speaker a question about universities’ social responsibility to accept students of all economic backgrounds and learned that the familial income is not a consideration when universities are accepting students. There are schools in the U.S. that do the same thing, this schools classify themselves as need-blind. There are, however, universities that look at  a student’s economic background when determining who will be accepted. I was hoping to get an understanding of the economic diversity top universities in China display, but don’t have a clear answer yet. Our lecturer did mention, however, the various scholarships students are awarded upon admission. There are both need-based and merit-based scholarships available to students. Unlike like U.S. Chinese universities admit athletes after they have finished their careers. Yao Ming, for example, is a student at the university we visited. These students follow specialized degree programs to cater to their needs and abilities, and are welcomed to the university as what U.S. schools would call “non-traditional” students. I think it’s great that Chinese schools have programs that promote education even after many have found great success in their careers.

Day 4: Journalism – Practice, Process and Implications

March 3rd, 2014 by Tina

Here are some of the thoughts and questions in my mind today after listening to an urban planner/professor and expert on Chinese sustainability speak, and talking to Professors Chen and Fang:

– If journalists expect to be objective in their reporting, they must be objective with the questions they ask their sources.

– Thus, with the above reasoning, journalists should not enter an interview with a hidden agenda.

– Journalists should keep in mind who/what their source is representing at that point in time. The expert on sustainability works with the government and has dealt with media before; of course she is not going to say anything against those things.

– But, if it’s an interview – or digging through evidence – to find out “x” factor that is not transparent, then does it become necessary to adopt an “agenda”, if obtaining that information becomes the mission?

– But is the very act of finding any information on its own an agenda?

– If a non-profit organization, company, etc. pretty much writes their own articles for the media, then that’s not journalism – that’s public relations.

– Public relations isn’t the sister of journalism – journalism has no boundaries on information reporting (other than when seeking to minimize harm, per the second entry on the SPJ Code of Ethics, which is to minimize harm… but I might delve into that later)… but public relations does. Journalism, in theory (not necessarily in practice), goes one step further than public relations.

One of the things the expert on Chinese sustainability mentioned was that China’s news covers the concept of “green” more than people can imagine, in a higher and better capacity than the United States covers it. The expert used an example of something he/she had heard on a morning radio show in the United States, which was someone stating that the source of climate change is the sun, and that you wouldn’t hear such an unintelligent statement in the Chinese press.

– To quote Voltaire: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

– Based on the expert’s statement about what the climate denier said… does the notion of a “free press” (“free” meaning no third party stands between the journalist and the source and limits what can or cannot be said) mean the slowing down of progress in areas such as environmental issues?

In retrospect, the urban developer/professor somewhat answered my question above without even knowing it. He talked about how after the U.S. embassy showed the air quality index (I believe he was referencing Shanghai, and not Beijing), coverage of environmental issues increased in the Chinese media, although even before that, there was lots of coverage on “green,” just not the grassroots side of it (which is what the organization he works for focuses on). The government even gives money to make green buildings happen. Free-flowing information can spark a change, and I think even terribly researched opinions (like those of global warming deniers in the United States), can start movement in the “right” direction (in the case of the environment, towards greener initiatives), because whenever there is a statement, there is also a counterstatement.

A worker with the Shanghai Subway Company gave the second lecture of the day. My interaction with this speaker and others and watching the interactions of the group with this speaker and others has reinforced the importance of clarification in asking questions in journalism. The worker talked about how safety is one of the biggest challenges facing the Shanghai subway system right now. I wasn’t sure exactly what she meant by safety – as safety can encompass many things – so I asked her to define it. She answered that by “safety,” she meant “daily safety” – getting people where they want to go and having drivers who work carefully on a daily basis.

So far, this trip has made me think a lot about the practice, process, and implications of journalism.

*The newspaper pictured above is not related to the speakers or lecture topics. It is merely a newspaper I saw in a coffee shop.

Day 2 – Arrival, Education Lecture, and The Bund – Tina

March 2nd, 2014 by Tina

My first day in Shanghai was wonderful, but also tiring. We arrived at Pu Dong airport around 10:15 in the morning on Saturday (CST) and checked in at our hotel. Then, we had lunch and listened to a teacher from Shanghai Middle School and someone from the Municipal Education Commission. The points they covered were interesting, such as there being two types of public schools in Shanghai (the first being governed by Shanghai’s municipal government, and the second being governed by Shanghai’s districts), that private schools are considered better for junior high but not for high school, for which public schools are considered better, and that parents pay sky-high private tutoring fees for their children. Interestingly, I learned that high school campus newspaper cannot really criticize the administration, which is true for high school campus newspaper in the United States too, for the most part.

Unfortunately, I wasn’t feeling well and had to excuse myself 20 minutes or so before the lecture ended. I ended up not visiting The Bund – and consequently missed the seeing the beautiful Shanghai skyline – with the group because I basically crawled into bed and collapsed, but I’m visiting on Saturday (our free day) with one of the other group members. I’m super excited about visiting! Everyone said it was amazing, and I can’t wait to go.

On the flight to Beijing, Professor Chen handed me a newspaper (China Daily) with two or three articles on air pollution in it. International flights typically have a free portable stand filled with newspapers before entering the physical plane (in the passageway), with its nation’s major newspapers. My project is on how journalists in Shanghai cover air pollution, and the fact that a major Chinese newspaper had a few articles on air pollution, and that said newspaper was being offered freely in such a public and international setting, was the first clue on the trip that journalists are able to report on air-pollution, and that China is not explicitly attempting to hide anything in regards to air pollution.